- 註冊時間
- 2023-5-6
- 精華
- 在線時間
- 小時
- 米币
-
- 最後登錄
- 1970-1-1
累計簽到:5 天 連續簽到:1 天
|
發表於 2025-1-4 02:48:33
|
顯示全部樓層
Mohamed El Kholy , Rasha Tarif Hamza * , Mohamed Saleh and Heba Elsedfy* B0 B: v! N; i7 b
Penile length and genital anomalies in Egyptian
) l* m/ D$ A* Q3 {% c7 lmale newborns: epidemiology and influence of
) s4 U& q- o, N/ [4 ^endocrine disruptors
2 @9 T: E% C& L8 V. EAbstract: This is an attempt to establish the normal5 [3 U% |4 N6 m- r5 l0 t+ y6 B! U2 z
stretched penile length and prevalence of male geni-
. u+ z1 s: b6 G! Htal anomalies in full-term neonates and whether they' d1 E8 {" T# r% [
are influenced by prenatal parental exposure to endo-7 X; x% g p$ l7 p4 J) f. Z
crine-disrupting chemicals. A thousand newborns were
' G0 k% ~' z/ g3 E5 r8 ^included; their mothers were subjected to the following/ q# x7 @1 {" Y8 c7 B, M9 g
questionnaire: parents ’ age, residence, occupation, con-! @" O% O! J9 L4 D3 z- o
tact with insecticides and pesticides, antenatal exposure: G$ e- f9 q) K+ D) ~
to cigarette smoke or drugs, family history of genital
- h1 Y% O! j/ Y8 d2 Vanomalies, phytoestrogens intake and history of in vitro
) b, d9 v5 N* v5 X% ~( |. |8 _' Nfertilization or infertility. Free testosterone was measured
1 u' [$ ^9 c9 ain 150 neonates in the first day of life. Mean penile length P6 `: f5 W7 D% z/ v' f$ [
was 3.4 ± 0.37 cm. A penile length < 2.5 cm was considered
% V4 J3 z) r6 _& S5 Q- pmicropenis. Prevalence of genital anomalies was 1.8 %2 O& I% x& \6 E& t+ o1 R8 o0 b
(hypospadias 83.33 % ). There was a higher rate of anoma-: }0 O- A0 m: b0 ~
lies in those exposed to endocrine disruptors (EDs; 7.4 % )0 Z& h' D# p8 T' z8 P, i" w7 G; ~9 ~
than in the non-exposed (1.2 % ; p < 0.0001; odds ratio 6,
[) I; Y: ? E" e' _! k- I: S95 % confidence interval 2 – 16). Mean penile length showed0 z9 h, s3 _1 k
a linear relationship with free testosterone and was lower
l0 ]# I! n0 O% V- g Xin neonates exposed to EDs.
3 n @! r' D4 D4 V- q* d; ?Keywords: endocrine disruptors; genital anomalies; male;
) {' f) N9 ~5 c1 epenile length; testosterone.0 `# K1 L9 i8 p. H
*Corresponding author : Rasha Tarif Hamza, MD, Faculty of; f1 b. }# ?( m4 Y# d8 C
Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Ain Shams University, 361 k0 r7 ~* N6 m7 ^6 I( n
Hisham Labib Street, off Makram Ebeid Street, Nasr City, Cairo% B# b! P3 X6 L' T
11371, Cairo, Egypt, Phone: + 20-2-22734727, Fax: + 20-2-26904430 ,: ~! D0 X5 ]1 ?% s% B
E-mail: [email protected]' T0 u7 n7 f) ]& T6 B. M" q+ F
Mohamed El Kholy, Mohamed Saleh and Heba Elsedfy: Faculty of4 |# }) v, K6 q( e
Medicine , Department of Pediatrics, Ain Shams University, Cairo,! T- k8 D" y, h( _ j
Egypt
1 h9 a( `5 A2 OIntroduction5 o5 J6 w7 U0 K8 w S
Determination of penile size is employed clinically in
1 p3 L1 Y" P6 ?4 |: Q. _$ m }3 pthe evaluation of children with abnormal genital devel-/ z- g# U' e* k
opment, such as, for example, micropenis, defined as a- ]" J/ k8 J( |
penis that is normal in terms of shape and function, but is
7 q* V8 R5 q/ \( c" ~3 U6 umore than 2.5 standard deviations (SD) smaller than mean3 e: R2 N% \: x( Q$ N
size in terms of length (1) . However, these measurements
/ x0 W8 m0 I1 S% J% J* y! @7 Hcan be subject to significant international variations, in3 D- N+ c( x6 I& y* X# _! C
addition to being obtained with different methodologies
" j% c+ Q9 l# B2 ^' Kin some cases (2) .
* p: U. [. U0 B0 hOver the past 20 years, the documented increase in, x& I; m' |8 x3 S- W; y' u: `: |' @
disorders of male sexual differentiation, such as hypo-* [& R( [0 E5 S
spadias, cryptorchidism, and micropenis, has led to the
+ H+ u( S* `' _+ {2 T, j. wsuspicion that environmental chemicals are detrimental
' a ~! u; M) G3 b* D* vto normal male genital development in utero (3) . The so-& C8 ^# L1 y* f
called Sharpe-Skakkebaek hypothesis offered a possible
$ I( \ d* C3 e* h4 h6 R% Dcommon cause and toxicological mechanism for abnor-
0 n: a( @) G( p& vmalities in men and boys – that is, increased exposure to2 c8 v* J1 A: T0 {
oestrogen in utero may interfere with the multiplication
; h, u) Y4 L& X; L g) g z" j; |of fetal Sertoli cells, resulting in hormonally mediated
! H/ f# d4 h( e5 ~; O! t3 n! zdevelopmental effects and, after puberty, reduced quality
/ m! i( K) O3 c9 G1 |. o1 rof semen (4) .
. }$ k0 L! {8 P2 hIt has been proposed that these disorders are part of6 I& j* Q4 \ g7 J% C
a single common underlying entity known as the testicu-
' H# u; G; |2 zlar dysgenesis syndrome (TDS) (5) . TDS comprises various( [6 u, ` B1 }& i; z% X
aspects of impaired gonadal development and function,
- p. F' ~2 X. D f! W( aincluding abnormal spermatogenesis, cryptorchidism,# b' p, \: ~1 I# V1 B' B" {
hypospadias, and testicular cancer (6) .
9 C/ C- Q" W4 r5 YThe etiological basis for this condition is complex
0 I. c7 q n! p# _- A$ z1 Q6 Qand is thought to be due to a combination of both genetic
& Q2 @/ G! [1 p% s, Sand environmental factors that result in the disruption
# `% `9 ^9 o& Uof normal gonadal development during fetal life. First,. V! j' |) D5 N6 u& t
it was proposed that environmental chemicals with oes-
$ W' i9 f" G7 l9 W8 ~trogen-like actions could have adverse effects on male/ y7 m( [! T" O4 |. b) X
gonadal development. This has since been expanded to" o1 g. C! p4 g
include environmental chemicals with anti-androgen: x: ^& T" B ] A, X
actions and it is now thought that an imbalance between" o' h: T& c+ h e& o
androgen and oestrogen activity is the key mechanism by
% v" H: m" w. twhich exposure to endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs)
: Y! S8 {( \+ t- L9 Vresults in the development of TDS and male reproductive1 K$ {% C3 Z* B/ r+ R# I; e
tract abnormalities (5) .
' y. h6 E0 F- U2 U5 \With the increasing use of environmental chemicals,$ }8 \5 B9 x0 V3 G
an attempt was made to establish the normal stretched
7 [0 q# |+ P2 g$ z3 v5 vpenile length as well as the prevalence of male genital- O5 q1 g6 Y& \5 t
anomalies in full-term neonates and whether there is an8 G/ A0 I" i/ n
influence of prenatal parental exposure to potential EDCs1 m( h; y$ D. ?7 j& V! k$ W6 F5 q
on these parameters.
# N& A3 ~5 G6 [- J! K; w1 UBrought to you by | University of California - San Francisco
: Q, o' M m% a, r7 m; xAuthenticated! ?* k) C' w+ x. C( R& k- b$ X
Download Date | 2/18/15 4:26 AM
7 v& c( u6 \5 |/ C( X9 C510 El Kholy et al.: Penile length and male genital anomalies1 v5 `. ~$ v e8 p9 d: w" K
Subjects and methods
' Y( h* o! \& H* {Study population9 w: L' w+ ~ m
The study was conducted as a prospective cohort study at the Univer-- Q2 z' y; K" P0 M" i+ q. A# h
sity Hospital of Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt. A sample of 1000% `' e n; U1 U: y' d( P
male full-term newborns was studied.5 W: T6 U! r6 K8 p4 N0 k& X
Sampling technique
* ?6 L. f. s4 j( c6 G9 XThree days per week were selected randomly out of 7 days. In each
7 a9 a( [- p: h: gday, all male full-term deliveries were selected during the time of fi eld
. j4 p" E* |# |. @/ J ?study (12 h) during the period from March 2007 to November 2007.
, C1 o+ R- M& Y. IStatistical analysis
1 |0 n) u5 ]7 u1 s1 fThe computer program SPSS for Windows release 11.0 (SPSS Inc.,
* v8 g4 {+ ? [; s+ c" BChicago, IL, USA) was used for data entry and analysis. All numeric
4 b( m5 t4 [) jvariables were expressed as mean ± SD. Comparison of diff erent vari-. w% w' t5 M$ E; t& A
ables between two groups was done using the Student ’ s t-test for5 w m( t+ |* d
normally distributed variables. Comparisons of multiple groups were# o" _: O$ z/ l6 j, q1 B' u- t, c
done using analysis of variance and post hoc tests for normally dis-9 r- e, A3 A8 [+ m, s' l
tributed variables. The χ 2 -test was used to compare the frequency of" [; ]9 t6 C. ], c5 N9 G4 D
qualitative variables among the diff erent groups; the Fisher exact test" m2 B" S: g7 {5 t$ t
was performed in tables containing values < 5. The Pearson correla-0 s# N" P' B7 v |' p ~1 N
tion test was used for correlating various variables. For all tests, a
4 `; @$ |5 m, B! u2 Lprobability (p) < 0.05 was considered signifi cant (10) .9 h+ [ w) K3 h) s
Results
Y8 _8 d1 l8 b/ B2 cData collected
. ?$ h: H6 y ^. b9 a: [/ NA researcher completed a structured questionnaire during inter-
- g' T- G) o/ { \( ` O' a0 dviews with the mothers. The questionnaire gathered information. [/ |8 o' a( g! ?
on the following: age of parents; residence; occupation of the
+ D0 _+ P9 y: E0 H* \1 Tparents; contact with insecticides and pesticides and their type and
0 J' o1 D1 N/ H& L9 Dfrequency of contact; maternal exposure to cigarette smoke during8 {1 g5 O" Y% M8 G- E- m+ F& j+ E
pregnancy; maternal drug history during gestation; family history
3 ~% D: ]. i2 D0 u* vof hypospadias, cryptorchidism, or other congenital anomalies; in-
$ J6 B# P% V9 x* \+ D- `& }+ F- mtake of foods containing phytoestrogens, e.g., soy beans, olive oil,
& V, t# z I1 L+ {) O% W* `garlic, hummus, sesame seed, and their frequency; and, also, his-! `( d2 C9 f+ F' g- N: ?+ |. f
tory of in vitro fertilization or infertility (type of infertility and drugs
( L- @2 ?7 \ fgiven).
; Y- H5 @2 S- G$ ?& W6 tEnvironmental exposure to chemicals was evaluated for its po-+ G9 B' O. x2 d# H8 ?
tential of causing endocrine disruption. Chemicals were classifi ed
2 `9 @* M1 C$ d) b% F8 jinto two groups on the basis of scientifi c evidence for their having
+ R' `9 f2 Y; Fendocrine-disrupting properties: group I: evidence of endocrine dis-
: _5 b1 j) D* Eruption high and medium exposure concern; group II: no evidence of5 z, s( p% ~5 o. e" {( g0 J
endocrine disruption and low exposure concern (7) .1 ^$ ?& l! a6 o! ]" O/ U: j8 s
Descriptive data
6 [" r( l" x/ O( x RThe mean age of newborns ’ fathers was 36 ± 6 years (range
# z! j* @* D2 y20 – 50 years) and that of mothers was 26 ± 5 years (range% b$ H! O0 T* ?4 a/ B
19 – 42 years). Exposure to EDs started long before preg-
2 W8 I/ h8 t+ O9 B7 l% Y; v% F4 \nancy and continued throughout pregnancy. Regard-* U; K: N+ o7 E$ U
ing therapeutic history during pregnancy, 99 mothers: Y4 @& a' y! J# P" D$ D3 z+ e
(9.9 % ) received progestins, 14 (1.4 % ) received insulin,
! d3 O% q# K" V6 (0.6 % ) received heparin, 4 (0.04 % ) received long-
8 o- f* n O1 `8 {acting penicillin, 3 (0.3 % ) received aspirin, 2 (0.2 % )8 B2 P5 a: P0 z$ [* M& `; f
received B2 agonist, and 1 (0.1 % ) received thyroxin,
% e. s) v7 H" a9 `while the rest did not receive any medications during
/ ?) f6 s: z- ]$ c, [' kpregnancy except for the known multivitamins and9 d+ f: j6 q5 E! z9 k
calcium supplementations. In addition, family history* ]: D0 E9 m1 [) a7 d
of newborns born small for gestational age was positive# G* X' S; d5 d) ^/ x
in 21 cases (2.1 % ).' E; U+ \& d8 x- h; Y0 M
Examination
9 G+ G6 v% P0 r+ ?& `% g( V: bIn addition to the full examination by the paediatric staff , each boy, @! N7 U9 N6 ~5 \0 |( a8 E' T
was examined for anomalies of the external genitalia during the6 }" N) m, c) L3 {) F
fi rst 24 h of life by one specially trained researcher. Examination
) | V0 P8 e! [1 U5 ?of the genital system included measurement of stretched penile3 c% p) N. |$ ?" c' x# d. U) y& M
length (8) and examination of external genitalia for congenital9 A: Q/ r: B. b
anomalies such as cryptorchidism (9) and hypospadias. Hypospa-
+ p' E$ ]2 p3 [0 J5 zdias was graded as not glanular, coronal, penile, penoscrotal, scro-
3 E2 p$ V7 O/ N& ctal, or perineal according to the anatomical position. Cases of iso-
' x$ T# m1 P' L2 zlated malformed foreskin without hypospadias were not included
7 @1 H+ I2 w2 @2 P% b8 Fas cases.. P# c4 N5 n" c* ~! C: n' c# U. ?
Penile length
. ], O+ X+ ?9 O9 A) w% k0 \4 ~- RLaboratory investigations7 l3 k# b# {! O4 v) V- a
Free testosterone level was measured in 150 randomly chosen neo-
" t( y9 ]4 [2 a9 K! d# y- mnates from the studied sample in the fi rst day of life (enzyme im-" @' O9 @* ]: _0 k: z" c
munoassay test supplied by Diagnostics Biochem Canada, Inc.,
) O# h6 r- r8 b1 Q: C, k! vDorchester, Ontario, Canada).
- W& t3 P4 m4 a8 ?, e; kMean penile length was 3.41 ± 0.37 cm (range 2.4 – 4.6 cm).
% Z3 t4 ]) B bA penile length < 2.5 cm was considered micropenis ( < the
. G4 n+ z7 z9 J6 Qmean by 2.5 SD). Two cases (0.2 % ) were considered to
`6 Y d* u8 P/ Ihave micropenis. Mean penile length was lower (p = 0.041)8 K+ o, h4 C9 h9 O- D4 W
in neonates exposed to EDs (n = 81, 3.1 cm) compared to the2 a7 @5 M; Z5 v8 d6 y( _0 P
non-exposed group (n = 919, 3.4 cm; Figure 1 ).. M6 X$ x# S/ S" v9 N; P
There was a linear relationship between penile length
* [2 Q6 i' z$ ~! a; Jand the length of the newborn with a regression coef-
8 k. w5 @0 }4 L; @# Hficient of 0.05 (95 % CI 0.04 – 0.06; p < 0.0001), i.e., there) F+ d: Y* j: u: H3 T0 b5 c
was an increase of 0.05 cm for each unit increase in length; t# ~$ V q0 n
(cm). Similarly, there was a linear relationship between
0 U) t$ E& K* ^) Qpenile length and the weight of the newborn with a regres-
+ h3 ]1 Q6 g% b2 l, w0 S/ [; Ssion coefficient of 0.14 (95 % CI 0.09 – 0.18; p < 0.0001), i.e.,* n0 b. P& q1 v4 I5 c+ E
there was an increase of 0.14 cm for each unit increase in# x P6 h& E! X/ i! V8 y1 ]7 n) N& t
weight (kg).
7 E C2 Y; `7 gBrought to you by | University of California - San Francisco: [) V! X$ G2 i0 K
Authenticated! D* G% S$ v% c( V
Download Date | 2/18/15 4:26 AM
, t- ?# q4 x, P4 ]/ [9 XEl Kholy et al.: Penile length and male genital anomalies 511! i% v1 j8 F4 W7 ?/ Z6 y4 t0 a5 W
3.45
6 q8 z8 M% \- u3 E( H& S. C3.402 x2 r$ L" O# j; U( l$ Y8 z
3.358 `0 j' V3 n+ _# g& ^
3.302 V# z6 v7 K7 Q
3.257 ?; H @$ d3 v0 w ?
3.20
& A: G, {* s+ u% C+ q5 J9 O& P {3.15! Y* `# p5 ~" e3 ^* Z" q; T* b3 K
3.10) G4 J& P3 H- E5 ` t/ k
3.055 O$ M: b4 ^' d2 ?
3.00
/ c( I: T0 e- U2.95
2 w$ ?3 ]3 f6 N' C l+ n* Z; b2.90
( G/ I* `( k5 YMean
k5 }0 z2 c% t) @- H4 Jpenile- ^ D. f0 Y0 K3 K0 E1 N6 n
length
& m) X9 \1 h& Q2 J3 H/ I% Han odds ratio of 6 (95 % CI 2 – 16), i.e., the exposed persons
/ e/ D) N# N6 a1 A nwere six times more likely to develop anomalies than4 s% k$ A% [" o5 F) o
those not exposed (Table 1 ).& @. ]; S3 _3 Y2 |% \3 K
Genital anomalies were detected in the offspring- l+ Y. C4 q* Y: }
of those exposed to chlorinated hydrocarbons (9.52 % ),2 N( y7 `9 G; |' P
phthalate esters (8.70 % ), and heavy metals (6.25 % ). In6 g( q/ L# e9 z+ C& {
contrast, none of the newborns exposed to phenols had
! {6 z+ m2 q3 X3 t- u' t2 p0 o" zgenital anomalies (Table 2 ).5 c5 a9 U/ R; A, n8 u9 s
Exposed
; |0 R) [- v' J6 w( K- j2 Q5 k$ xNon exposed
; P! {4 W/ s- n8 V2 d+ L' YPenile lengths according to exposure to endocrine/ |- E& u L. s6 O$ o8 t
Figure 1 disruptors.* ?; {+ H6 K* c) Q. z" _
Serum free testosterone levels; \9 U' `: k6 @% |# ^
Exposure to cigarette smoke and progestins" q+ t& G! M3 c9 u) X+ ?! T
during the first trimester
* v+ A- g; z# i1 s! aNone of the mothers in the study was an active smoker;+ b, z% a+ E: b! w4 A Y/ B
350 were only exposed through passive smoking. There6 [: e& k# y7 z
was no difference between rates of anomalies among
- z8 Y! t9 I, A) q0 Zthose exposed to cigarette smoke when compared to those
# d$ {: |& o5 o" fnot exposed (1.1 % vs. 2.2 % ). Similarly, there was no differ-# I* K: X( Y; O/ ]. w
ence between the rates of anomalies among those exposed1 ^# ^$ h- W" @- b0 P- I; T
to progestins during the first trimester when compared to, N! E1 O. @ E" y5 ?
the non-exposed ones (2 % vs. 1.8 % ).* H0 H) x7 P4 y) ~. C( U# u" x
In the first day of life, serum free testosterone levels
$ V, t) w. ?, H, y( Qranged between 7.2 and 151 pg/mL (mean 61.9 ± 38.4 pg/mL;
& v [" ^- r$ wmedian 60 pg/mL). There was a linear relationship
% B& d0 a8 {2 T$ f( @) wbetween penile length and testosterone level of the: a8 |0 ~" d% C' p2 V) \
newborn with a regression coefficient of 0.002 (95 % CI
+ I- W& w8 i8 l7 j- W) p) e0.0004 – 0.003; p = 0.01), i.e., there was an increase of 0.2 cm$ g' a+ v, |1 C8 d/ `; e. o& D
in penile length per 100 pg/mL increase in testosterone
' g) P9 {2 }, Z" wlevel. Moreover, serum testosterone level was significantly
7 v, f1 C% j: P" alower in newborns exposed to EDs (49.50 ± 22.3 pg/mL)
6 ^7 A( C9 x& r1 I& `than in the non-exposed group (72.20 ± 31.20 pg/mL;
9 _2 _4 Y! ?/ d4 M7 kp < 0.01).1 _ J- E7 h4 c$ ?
Table 1 Frequency of genital anomalies according to type of6 K" C' F' v8 H$ t9 V2 Q* }! |, R9 g
exposure to endocrine disruptors.. o4 o# _ w$ j0 |# U) f, {
Exposure to endocrine9 \) q4 u) a/ c$ |0 r. E; K
disruptors
) x! a2 a( ?! r$ iPrevalence of genital anomalies. V$ E9 O/ s& u& c. }- y
Anomalies Total1 U+ y! x: Y" B" l
Negative Positive) a3 w0 }+ i# j; q- x+ W) A
Negative exposure 908 11 919$ f& T$ }7 X/ r0 h' ~
98.8 % 1.2 % 100.0 %
( _& k$ M. X1 W8 xPositive exposure 75 6 818 w4 j u* C+ c, I' {. ~
92.6 % 7.4 % 100.0 %7 M7 S- Y% R/ i5 O* ^' q
Total 983 17 10008 H% O2 j+ @% Z* q+ y8 [
98.3 % 1.7 % 100.0 %
+ J+ s' }, y Sχ 2 = 25.05, p < 0.0001.9 L1 t' W2 t& \% c
Over the study period, the birth prevalence of genital( q9 W9 |1 x. e% a
anomalies was 1.8 % , i.e., 18/1000 live birth. Hypospadias
4 D$ X3 h! M; c3 Qaccounted for 83.33 % of the cases. Fourteen had glanu-; L4 f8 k! T2 u; z: g! U* z
lar hypospadias and one had coronal hypospadias. One
( [. c4 u7 C, I, d! g, s! w& Vhad penile torsion and another had penile chordee. Right-+ _$ F) k) n6 l
sided cryptorchidism was present in one newborn.
$ i& c8 U* P4 o4 YExposure to EDCs
% j: O X+ e2 G0 l' ZAmong the whole sample, 81 newborns (8.10 % ) were
* m/ @; A% O+ }, b, aexposed to EDs. The duration of exposure varied from
9 o0 W2 f1 y. X& i' M1 [2 to 32 years with a frequency of exposure ranging from
" n5 ] G: y3 M0 h, q, J! Jweekly to 2 – 3 months per year.0 g3 G) `5 O6 S6 m8 c5 A% w% Q2 Y
There was a significantly higher rate of anomalies
7 s8 A- W/ u* A% Q! Z0 C B/ wamong those who were exposed to EDs when compared
, ?. h9 P8 w9 v# ]2 d! Z0 Q) }/ U6 lto non-exposed newborns (7.4 % vs. 1.2 % ; p < 0.0001), with2 i7 C' |+ }4 q; V, O
Table 2 Type of endocrine disruptor and percentage of anomalies in
+ o8 R$ R% s4 d) M! @# I+ F2 ?7 Mthe group of neonates exposed to endocrine disruptors (n = 81).
/ l7 D4 |; T8 ]3 p! D0 ?* i% QAnomalies Total6 e% c% Y" p) H
Negative Positive6 ~: x" o/ M; Q( m3 ?
Chlorinated hydrocarbons (farmers) 19 2 21
! u& L3 [ ~6 H6 \90.48 % 9.52 % 100.0 %
( u& ]0 z# d& y/ \Heavy metals (iron smiths, welders) 30 2 32
/ c; I. C9 D2 G- F- q7 k6 E93.75 % 6.25 % 100.0 %
( u, z: @, w+ ]8 {3 v( [/ }Phthalate esters (house painters) 21 2 23
Y4 }, h; _3 }, k/ A4 V* M91.30 % 8.70 % 100.0 %
* Q1 K* v8 N( }7 T8 y6 vPhenols (car mechanics) 5 0 5" h4 M" r2 m+ S3 |7 }
100.0 % 0 % 100.0 %! ~/ l0 M. w p9 b! Y8 D! d
Total 75 6 81$ y; }; G. Z8 `/ {; l b. x$ z
92.60 % 7.40 % 100.0 %
: x1 b7 H# j- u) `Brought to you by | University of California - San Francisco
! {" i4 B# ~" Q: z+ uAuthenticated+ [( L8 @ R8 U
Download Date | 2/18/15 4:26 AM
3 m8 L8 t! ^: t; B- v! Z$ l2 h512 El Kholy et al.: Penile length and male genital anomalies
6 S# t1 g0 l! j; P5 TDiscussion
5 d3 V& V; x5 x- @Previously reported penile lengths varied from 2.86 to 3.75 cm9 ?7 \/ m3 q( t! V5 ?
(11 – 16) and depended on ethnicity. In Saudi Arabia (13) ," e6 g( i1 @; E6 w; U+ e
mean newborn penile length was 3.55 ± 0.57 cm, slightly
; B0 H5 O9 W' Z! m" Ghigher than our mean value. However, the cut-off lower
; e" l9 }# E) ^8 x& R( Y8 Glimit ( – 2.5 SD) was calculated to be 2.13 cm (vs. 2.5 cm in
1 h6 w; r0 c& t# B" |0 iour cohort). This emphasizes the importance of establish-
6 Z7 C7 u0 j [( C: Y' ^; Ring the normal values for each country because the normal
. t* s$ w4 U7 p2 F9 s; H ~% prange could vary markedly. In a multiethnic community,/ J2 ^/ l" m& v# f
a mean length of – 2.5 SD was used for the definition of
" i6 ~7 U' y! h5 emicropenis and was 2.6, 2.5, and 2.3 cm for Caucasian,8 Y. r' |; J# }% e
East-Indian, and Chinese babies, respectively (p < 0.05).
/ ]) Z/ G2 `2 K: ~' x5 hThis is close to the widely accepted recommendation that
4 R) P- y* F0 L7 Ia penile length of 2.4 – 2.5 cm be considered as the lowest
3 Z) x8 N0 p+ Ylimit for the definition of micropenis (8) . The recognition
- L' c, ?, m6 z( i8 E, sof micropenis is important, because it might be the only/ o# [- A8 r! h/ \
obvious manifestation of pituitary or hypothalamic hor-
- M0 T- t8 G) I. vmonal deficiencies (17) ., F+ h) L% m K% S4 L: q a [
The timing for measurement of testosterone in new-
, o) z8 o+ g) [ rborns is highly variable but, generally, during the first 2
) g* ?) a$ Y, r Zweeks of life (18) . In our study, serum testosterone level' ]: X2 m. p5 o( d- O; x
was measured in all newborns on day 1 in order to fix a2 C( ~8 p' \( K; ^" T7 }
time for sample withdrawal in all newborns and, also, to
: V; r' @5 s( q5 M; g ymake sure that all samples were withdrawn before mothers6 _; F+ @7 _1 `/ `$ c: R: T
were discharged from the maternity hospital. We found a2 N1 J* c3 G. I/ E! M
linear relationship between penile length and testosterone3 ]/ o) _2 \; f2 A9 E6 B, v/ R# W
levels of newborns. Mean penile length was lower in neo-
) f Z3 y/ j% o+ v9 `4 Mnates exposed to EDs compared to the non-exposed group,2 p% M( X$ p9 ]% w
which could be related to the lower testosterone levels in
3 q; ^ V9 J5 T3 [8 R3 u+ nthe exposed group. The etiology of testicular dysgenesis/ w& b- ^" @+ D8 o" b; f
syndrome (TDS) is suspected to be related to genetic and/or' _" ` Z3 z( \' N4 T' `& y0 p
environmental factors, including EDs. Few human studies# u2 D( p2 N( U) L) Y
have found associations/correlations between EDs, includ-' H: B: i+ v8 y! K. X' {1 h0 O" F! O
ing phthalates, and the different TDS components (18) .3 z3 @) ?4 S" m9 t! O7 ~/ a8 k4 E
Some reports have suggested an increase in hypo-
! G0 S, ?+ S' t+ G F1 F5 f% Pspadias rates during the period 1960 – 1990 in European- a8 {7 {, H4 J5 X+ ^1 ^: o& }, z
and US registries (19 – 23) . There are large geographical% i7 o& a0 _7 a1 m, _
differences in reported hypospadias rates, ranging from+ W2 \ z5 J: E4 Z$ j! E8 y
2.0 to 39.7/10,000 live births (23 – 25) . Several explanations8 B! k! H3 `, h% g7 f
have been proposed for the increasing trends and geo-
6 g2 w; J1 I2 p) m) f+ a1 ?graphical differences. As male sexual differentiation is1 ?' [9 K5 r; M& u S) `7 d6 n
critically dependent on normal androgen concentrations,
$ A3 t# ^" J; `/ e) \* `2 lincreased exposure to environmental factors affecting, K0 `; ~- T5 ^! B# T0 w2 K' q
androgen homeostasis during fetal life (e.g., EDs with. t8 i( \! `0 }5 T8 Q5 l
estrogenic or anti-androgenic properties) may cause* ` k/ M, D7 U) E N, o
hypospadias (3, 4) .1 h& r4 X, k3 |6 v& |- ~6 l
In Western Australia, the average prevalence of hypo-
7 v& k$ M% ~+ xspadias in male infants was 67.7 per 10,000 male births.& A5 G& c* m& B! `
When applying the EUROCAT definition (24), the average
# d- ^* d' d9 b# i1 Wprevalence of hypospadias during 1980 – 2000 was 21.8 per
: t9 t' n( y0 a1 X: z9 v10,000 births and the average annual prevalence increased
/ J& r1 i5 z, l8 M' ssignificantly over the study period by 2.2 % per year. The
) D1 @9 C4 b* n- _: Wprevalence of hypospadias in this study was much higher
$ F; g0 H6 n+ M) O6 I( M; e; i* M3 mat 150 per 10,000; by excluding glanular hypospadias, the9 \7 @9 T+ R V' c: B( r
prevalence fell sharply to 10 per 10,000 (26) .
, O" Q- P" W: p$ D4 GWe found a higher rate of anomalies among newborns
; o1 I, R% w( R% Iexposed to EDs when compared to non-exposed newborns7 c. D$ \% _. b/ h
(7.4 % vs. 1.2 % ); this raises the issue that environmental
# p9 g1 T! ]# [' U$ Xpollution might play a role in causing these anomalies.
; ?% o6 ?0 P0 X% TWithin the last decade, several epidemiologic studies# u+ E9 x" b3 v `. ?5 H: {; n
have suggested environmental factors as a possible cause
' t8 F" G, k$ C; _# @for the observed increased incidence of abnormalities in& V8 H- h; `1 p
male reproductive health (27) . Parental environmental/
% U5 g2 N* ]; U& R! p: v1 d- V: Qoccupational exposure to EDs before/during pregnancy
: |3 q2 U/ t$ \5 u" g3 Xindicates that fetal contamination may be a risk factor for4 n# [! m5 M/ ^! h4 ^# ?0 i" Q
the development of male external genital malformation! N3 l8 ^9 {' G7 ?. s
(27 – 29) .
, S8 j4 `7 m/ n3 m. D$ Q0 v$ fReceived October 25, 2012; accepted January 27, 2013; previously
9 n/ C6 s5 q4 Q- c% d, ]3 W# dpublished online March 18, 2013
3 @: `6 x0 }- I+ RReferences3 E% h3 O" t! |) w& E s; i
1. Aaronson IA. Micropenis: medical and surgical implications. J; m' |. u# w: L/ U8 C
Urol 1994;152:4 – 14.
( d7 p* P$ D1 q: D4 p7 W9 }" _& M2. Gabrich PN, Vasconcelos JS, Dami ã o R, Silva EA. Penile anthro-
1 ]) y: k6 d+ t ^3 K* Lpometry in Brazilian children and adolescents. J Pediatr (Rio J)
* g8 D% I! C& h" l$ F) }2007;83:441 – 6.1 A% u# j5 F. u0 l5 R4 Y
3. Sultan C, Balaguer P, Terouanne B, Georget V, Paris F, et al.
8 k$ r# y2 O9 ^. k( }# oEnvironmental xenoestrogens, antiandrogens and disorders of
C8 u; Y6 g8 K) n' Hmale sexual differentiation. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2001;10:178:
, G) y. P- ]/ V99 – 105.
% W' V# b5 X/ }2 [ n0 K4. Sharpe RM, Skakkeb æ k NE. Are oestrogens involved in falling# M4 t6 C& R4 V, i$ \; U
sperm counts and disorders of the male reproductive tract ?" W' `* G9 Y2 a$ ?5 L @
Lancet 1993;341:1392 – 5.
9 K6 w2 l# F3 [* \' ]' V" ?5. Acerini CL, Hughes IA. Endocrine disrupting chemicals: a new' _9 C) r' g# }. R
and emerging public health problem ? Arch Dis Child 2006;91:2 ]- A/ j4 w; { @8 }+ a
633 – 41.
! S, c q3 n$ u6. Joensen UN, J ø rgensen N, Rajpert-De Meyts E, Skakkebaek NE.5 Q2 E0 x! n0 @. U! `+ m
Testicular dysgenesis syndrome and Leydig cell function. Basic m! Z! z% Q/ O1 G/ x% k" t. Y
Clin Pharmacol Toxicol 2008;102:155 – 61.3 B% D2 B) l3 z: K; @
7. IEH. Chemicals purported to be endocrine disruptors: a
6 S# ~! u% w# J5 x9 ccompilation of published lists. (Web Report W20), Leicester,
+ h' h/ L$ o% f4 k* S1 c) hUK: MRC Institute for Environmental Health, 2005. Accessed on
' I0 z1 @, O3 h# o$ hMarch 2005. Available at http://www.le.ac.uk/ieh/.8 W2 d& x& w! G j4 l. A5 N' M, |
8. Cheng PK, Chanoine JP. Should the definition of micropenis vary, j/ ~0 }, n: ~, U$ V
according to ethnicity ? Horm Res 2001;55:278 – 81.
; V* F5 W. ]0 B9 U$ j: P2 ?6 v7 B9 fBrought to you by | University of California - San Francisco
q* T+ N8 D, A7 k) UAuthenticated
! M# F) }% Z" J! J- FDownload Date | 2/18/15 4:26 AM3 B; S. u* b; w; ]8 b2 ?+ {1 Q3 O0 L
El Kholy et al.: Penile length and male genital anomalies 513
' X8 Q) B1 c9 K7 q21. K ä ll é n B, Bertollini R, Castilla E, Czeizel A, Knudsen LB, et al.& \+ [0 Q& d3 N7 Q- c
A joint international study on the epidemiology of hypospadias.
( I" H8 F* \' D% S9 x1 [' pActa Paediatr Scand 1986;324(Suppl):1 – 52.
2 ?/ Z2 W: O, d22. Paulozzi LJ, Erickson JD, Jackson RJ. Hypospadias trends in two2 `, v% `+ {: K8 f! P/ g
US surveillance systems. Pediatrics 1997;100:831 – 4.$ b" T/ R0 ?6 L
penile length in newborn and infants. BJU Int 1999;84 : 1093 – 4.
. Q* M! J/ v# _ `: DJ Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 2000;13 : 55 – 62.8 D ^* A0 m, @# i- @, }
Vasudevan G, Manivarmane B, Bhat BV, Bhatia BD, Kumar S.0 A2 s0 m3 E% _) Y" Q
Genital standards for south Indian male newborns. Indian J9 T" u3 q1 O6 `/ w- k
9. Scorer CG. The incidence of incomplete descent of the testicle at' t' q' _/ \6 }& O$ n% d' {9 x$ o
birth. Arch Dis Child 1956;31:198 – 202.
6 e; \2 h" B; j! R2 K G) b10. Daniel WW. Biostatistics: a foundation for analysis in the health
! s. _, h( i# g& t$ ]. lsciences, 6th ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 1995.; q9 `/ E% q4 a% Y7 X
11. Flatau E, Josefsberg Z, Reisner SH, Bialik O, Iaron Z. Letter:
) T- x* X& \2 |penile size in the newborn infants. J Pediatr 1975;87:663 – 4.
: B- N$ |/ o0 a x9 t12. Ozbey H, Temiz A, Salman T. A simple method for measuring
5 k1 f8 @) e, n9 Q) H. s8 X" `+ Q9 e! Q13. Al-Herbish AS. Standard penile size for normal full term& h) |& O% g( P0 e0 P# a. Z5 \
newborns in the Saudi population. Saudi Med J 2002;23:314 – 6.
: j; Y' {, E4 W5 ?$ ^- g14. Lian WB, Lee WR, Ho LY. Penile length of newborns in Singapore.
& P( t/ H* l5 V8 E15. Pediatr 1995;62:593 – 6.
) r# }. J( j2 f5 H) I; Y' w16. Boas M, Boisen KA, Virtanen HE, Kaleva M, Suomi AM, et al.
& y7 l: h6 X: G5 z; z' yPostnatal penile length and growth rate correlate to serum$ P! n9 s. b) G5 ~8 z8 p
testosterone levels: a longitudinal study of 1962 normal boys. c7 J+ K7 l6 }0 T" ?* d: J3 u, x$ E
Eur J Endocrinol 2006;154:125 – 9.
* `( Z5 b7 U" u17. Camurdan AD, Oz MO, Ilhan MN, Camurdan OM, Sahin F,* F9 X" Z6 G' c6 w1 r- y* U
et al. Current stretched penile length: cross-sectional study
* x+ D7 o! A7 tof 1040 healthy Turkish children aged 0 to 5 years. Urology
3 V% K6 }. D) y, I2007;70:572 – 5.* U' ^. G/ r9 N8 R0 r0 m1 P! m
18. Bay K, Asklund C, Skakkebaek NE, Andersson AM. Testicular$ T5 Y9 X" S; g* }" l- s
dysgenesis syndrome: possible role of endocrine disruptors.$ F7 j* j: g. L+ y* X/ N5 R2 o
Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 2006;20:77 – 90.7 ~5 M- ]8 w+ b6 W2 i0 S
19. Czeizel A. Increasing trends in congenital malformations of male
. @! Y8 }; g# o$ h% @0 h) Wexternal genitalia. Lancet 1985;i:462 – 3.
, Q6 u" g" f+ V8 F" l: H" n20. Matlai P, Beral V. Trends in congenital malformations of external
: q, p: k0 D0 ?" n- ^- ?7 Q3 Y6 `genitalia. Lancet 1985;i:108.
$ d* o+ ?$ H: d) e5 t23. Paulozzi LJ. International trends in rates of hypospadias
- I# n7 W! p6 y' r, b: Y/ {and cryptorchidism. Environ Health Perspect 1999;107:/ F8 c# ~1 J' V$ X" b* P6 f; x! F
297 – 302.* u; Z4 ^5 d8 B/ z: L/ w7 J, s3 \) ]2 B8 ^
24. EUROCAT Working Group. EUROCAT report 7. 15 years of
2 A8 }6 E( ~2 _# q' n6 psurveillance of congenital anomalies in Europe 1980 – 1994.
# v" l5 u( n" w; t+ k/ m4 H& x7 eBrussels, Belgium: Scientific Institute of Public Health-Louis
0 {; i: G, {. t, H) XPasteur, 1997.
5 B5 ?- ^9 P4 j. W% _+ a, g25. Toppari J, Kaleva M, Virtanen HE. Trends in the incidence
: P+ _! }! C- z4 R0 @! b: M6 ^1 cof cryptorchidism and hypospadias, and methodological, P; E5 c- B, w1 x! e
limitations of registry-based data. Hum Reprod Update
/ ?4 \! w: u, a! ]3 M% v2001;7:282 – 6.
* l3 i$ B" O2 _3 Q- }3 e, s9 N26. Nassar N, Bower C, Barker A. Increasing prevalence of
* {" c5 p% u6 dhypospadias in Western Australia, 1980 – 2000. Arch Dis Child! x' n( Q3 @6 L+ n' m; O
2007;92:580 – 4.
9 B6 _+ ~0 h$ l2 C; L, J/ I5 k$ X27. Wang MH, Baskin LS. Endocrine disruptors, genital
" M2 I6 @, A$ U+ U V5 T [development, and hypospadias. J Androl 2008;29:499 – 505.
5 ~& Q% |9 c/ p28. Morales-Su á rez-Varela MM, Toft GV, Jensen MS, Ramlau-Hansen
) m6 j- B2 x' T: I# m; sC, Linda Kaerlev L, et al. Parental occupational exposure to
1 ~! ]+ y c: ~0 cendocrine disrupting chemicals and male genital malfor-& N8 M, b- O: E- L) E: i* Y
mations: a study in the Danish National Birth Cohort Study.
: a" U7 Q6 R, x' s- kEnviron Health 2011;10:3.
+ L) ?' \4 `' }% V5 @, e29. Gaspari L, Sampaio DR, Paris F, Audran F, Orsini M, et al. High8 h1 o; u p! G+ i9 h4 K
prevalence of micropenis in 2710 male newborns from an& _% r( ]1 _/ G3 ?& }* W
intensive-use pesticide area of Northeastern Brazil. Int J Androl2 m! F. g0 \( |3 b
2012;35:253 – 64. |
|